The Politics of Enlargement: EU Member States’ Attitudes Toward Turkey’s Accession
By Evelina Kynigopoulos
Introduction
The European Union (EU) has long viewed enlargement as a fundamental tool for promoting stability, integration, and cooperation across the European continent. By inviting new member states into the fold, the EU has historically reinforced democratic norms, expanded its economic influence, and increased geopolitical security. However, not all enlargement efforts have been equally welcomed. Turkey’s long-standing bid for EU membership has stirred considerable debate and controversy, particularly among influential EU member states. This essay explores how historical experiences, cultural considerations, and economic and political concerns have shaped the positions of key EU countries—especially Germany and France—toward Turkey’s accession. While some European actors emphasize the strategic benefits of Turkey’s inclusion, others remain firmly opposed, casting doubt on whether full membership is a realistic goal.
Historical Context of EU Enlargement and Turkey's Candidacy
Since its inception, the EU has strategically expanded its membership to promote unity and stability in post-war Europe. The admittance of Southern European countries like Greece, Spain, and Portugal marked the EU's commitment to supporting nations transitioning to democracy. Similarly, the post-Cold War integration of Central and Eastern European states further reinforced the Union’s role as a stabilizing force and a symbol of economic and democratic opportunity.
Turkey, however, has had a markedly different experience. Although its ties with the EU date back several decades and its candidacy was officially recognized, Turkey has faced persistent and unique obstacles. Unlike prior enlargement rounds, which were largely framed as historical rectifications or steps toward European solidarity, Turkey's application triggered deeper debates over European identity, the nature of democracy, and the financial implications of accession. The distinct nature of Turkey’s case has set it apart and contributed to widespread hesitation within the EU.
Germany’s Fluctuating Position on Turkish Accession
Germany, as one of the EU’s most influential nations, has played a pivotal role in shaping the discourse around enlargement. Its stance on Turkey's membership has been inconsistent, reflecting broader shifts in domestic political leadership and evolving public opinion. In earlier decades, when more progressive or centrist political parties were in power, Germany tended to
support Turkey’s European ambitions, emphasizing diplomatic ties and mutual economic benefit. However, this support waned over time, particularly under more conservative governments that voiced skepticism about Turkey's compatibility with European norms.
Key concerns raised by German politicians and the public include issues surrounding cultural integration, economic disparities, and the potential for increased migration. Critics argue that Turkey’s large population, different cultural and religious traditions, and perceived democratic shortcomings make it a challenging fit for the EU’s institutional and social frameworks. As these concerns became more mainstream in Germany's political discourse, the country adopted a more cautious and sometimes openly oppositional stance, which has significantly influenced broader EU sentiment on the issue.
France’s Enduring Resistance to Turkish Membership
France has maintained a consistently critical view of Turkey’s potential membership, reflecting a combination of political conservatism, cultural considerations, and public skepticism. Unlike Germany, where opinions have shifted with changing governments, France has demonstrated long-term resistance, underpinned by a strong national discourse on identity and sovereignty. Successive French leaders, particularly during periods of rising nationalist sentiment, have positioned Turkey’s candidacy as a threat to European cohesion and values.
French public opinion has generally mirrored this official stance, often citing cultural and religious differences as a primary reason for opposition. Political leaders in France have also taken concrete steps to limit future enlargement efforts, including the implementation of legal mechanisms requiring referendums for the approval of new members under specific conditions. These policies are widely interpreted as preemptive measures aimed at blocking Turkey’s accession in particular. France’s position has therefore gone beyond mere rhetorical opposition, placing structural barriers in the path of Turkey’s EU ambitions.
Public Opinion and Diverging Perceptions
Public sentiment across EU member states is a powerful force in shaping policy on enlargement, and nowhere is this more evident than in the case of Turkey. While general support for EU expansion exists, it is often tempered by deeper concerns when it comes to Turkey. The Turkish bid has brought to light complex questions about what defines “Europeanness” and whether the EU is fundamentally a political-economic union or also a cultural and civilizational project.
In countries like Germany and France, the public tends to view Turkey as a nation that sits outside the traditional European identity framework. Religious and cultural differences are frequently invoked in public discussions, with critics arguing that Turkey’s predominantly Muslim population poses challenges for integration into a historically Christian-majority bloc.
Additionally, issues of social cohesion, freedom of expression, and the treatment of minorities in Turkey continue to trouble European observers and add to the perception that Turkey is not fully aligned with liberal democratic values.
Despite these reservations, there are segments of the European population that recognize the geopolitical importance of Turkey and the potential strategic benefits of its inclusion. Proponents argue that rejecting Turkey on the basis of identity alone undermines the EU’s principles of diversity, democracy, and unity. However, these arguments often struggle to gain traction in the face of more emotive concerns related to national culture and societal change.
Cultural Identity and European Values
At the heart of the debate over Turkey’s membership lies a broader question of European identity. What does it mean to be European? Is the EU a values-based community with shared cultural roots, or is it an open, inclusive institution focused on governance and cooperation? These questions have been brought into sharp relief by Turkey’s candidacy.
Opponents often frame their arguments through a lens of cultural incompatibility, suggesting that Turkey's traditions, societal norms, and religious profile are fundamentally different from those of existing member states. These sentiments are not limited to populist rhetoric—they are embedded in political platforms and media discourse across several EU nations. This perspective fosters a view of the EU as an exclusive club, where shared heritage and cultural proximity are as important as political or economic alignment.
On the other hand, advocates for Turkey’s accession highlight the diversity that already exists within the EU and argue that cultural difference should not be a disqualifying factor. They point out that the EU has previously integrated countries with distinct histories and traditions, suggesting that Turkey should be evaluated on its political reforms and alignment with EU norms rather than on religious or cultural identity.
Economic Concerns and Integration Challenges
Economic disparity is another critical issue fueling skepticism toward Turkish membership. The economic gap between Turkey and the average EU member state raises concerns about financial strain on the Union’s budget. Fears about the redistribution of EU funds, particularly in areas like agriculture and regional development, have made wealthier nations wary of enlargement.
There is also anxiety over the potential influx of Turkish workers into EU labor markets. Even though Turkey has a growing economy, differences in wages, employment conditions, and standards of living remain significant. Some EU citizens worry that Turkey’s integration could lead to job competition, wage suppression, or increased pressure on social welfare systems.
Beyond these practical concerns, critics also express doubts about Turkey’s ability to implement and sustain the structural reforms required for EU membership. While Turkey has taken steps to align its policies with EU norms, progress has been uneven. Issues related to transparency, judicial independence, and freedom of the press continue to raise red flags for EU officials and civil society groups alike.
Geopolitical Barriers and the Cyprus Dispute
In addition to cultural and economic issues, Turkey’s long standing geopolitical conflicts have further complicated its EU bid. One of the most persistent obstacles is the Cyprus dispute. Turkey does not officially recognize the Republic of Cyprus as a sovereign EU member state, creating a significant diplomatic impasse. The unresolved nature of this conflict has led to considerable tension within the EU, particularly among member states that view Turkey’s position as incompatible with the Union’s principles of mutual recognition and cooperation.
This issue is compounded by broader geopolitical tensions between Turkey and several EU countries. Disagreements over maritime borders, energy rights, and military activities in the Eastern Mediterranean have all contributed to a strained relationship. These tensions not only hinder accession talks but also influence the EU’s broader strategy toward regional stability and international diplomacy.
Strategic Cooperation as an Alternative Path
Despite the challenges and opposition to full membership, Turkey and the EU continue to engage in strategic cooperation across various sectors. Through agreements such as the Customs Union and joint refugee management efforts, both sides have demonstrated a willingness to collaborate when mutual interests align. These partnerships suggest that while full membership may remain elusive, functional cooperation remains both possible and beneficial.
This pragmatic approach offers a potential model for future engagement. Rather than focusing solely on accession, the EU and Turkey could explore more flexible arrangements that allow for deeper integration in selected policy areas. Such a strategy could help maintain positive relations while avoiding the political backlash associated with full membership. It would also enable gradual convergence on shared goals without the immediate pressure of institutional absorption.
Conclusion
Turkey’s candidacy for EU membership continues to illuminate deep divisions within the Union regarding the purpose, identity, and limits of enlargement. Germany and France, as key players in the EU, have shaped the debate through their political leadership, public discourse, and policy decisions. While cultural, economic, and geopolitical concerns dominate the opposition narrative, there is still recognition of Turkey’s strategic value.
Given the enduring nature of these challenges, full membership remains an uncertain goal. However, alternative forms of partnership—rooted in mutual cooperation and shared interests—offer more realistic and potentially productive paths forward. The future of EU-Turkey relations may not lie in accession, but in a reimagined framework of collaboration that reflects both the complexities and possibilities of the European project.
Bibliography
1. “The May 2004 Enlargement of the European Union: View from Two Years Out” Murphy, Alexander B. Academia.edu
2. “The Enlargement Preferences of the Major EU Member States and Their Impact on Turkish Accession” Köseoğlu, Emre. Marmara Universitesi (Turkey), 2007. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
3. "Detour to Europe: Enlargement, Southeast Europe, and the EU’s External Dynamic" Dahlman, Carl. Eurasian Geography and Economics, vol. 47, no. 6, 2006, pp. 683–700.
4. "Online Citizens' (De)legitimation of Turkey's EU Membership" Cmeciu, Camelia-Mihaela. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015
5. "Diagnosing Trends and Determinants in Public Support for Turkey's EU Membership" Çarkoğlu, Ali, and Çiğdem Kentmen. European Politics and Society, vol. 12, no. 3, 2011, pp. 377–393.
6. "EUROPE: Turkey's Membership in EU Remains a Distant Dream" Bianchi, Stefania. ProQuest Newsstand, 30 June 2005
7. "Is It in the EU's Interest to Enlarge Further? The Case of Turkey" Aktar, Cengiz. European Journal of Turkish Studies, no. 11, 2010.
